Services

Nine ways I help leadership teams get AI into production

Each one starts from a problem you already have and ends with something your team owns. And each is judged through three lenses.

Business

Cost, growth, risk and the P&L line the board will judge.

Product

What customers and employees will actually adopt, and how fast.

Technology

Architecture, performance, scale, governance and future-readiness.

Vamsi Talasila receiving the Entrepreneur of the Year (Healthcare) award on stage at the MSME India Business Awards
Entrepreneur of the Year (Healthcare), MSME India Business Awards
Strategy

Board & AI Strategy

"We have AI pilots, but no strategy tied to the P&L."

I start from the business outcome you're optimising (cost, growth or risk) and work back to two or three workflows where AI changes the unit economics. Then I build the roadmap, the operating model and the board narrative around them.

“If I can't draw a line from the AI to a number the CFO cares about, I don't fund it.”

What you get

  • AI maturity assessment across data, architecture, people and governance
  • A 12–36 month roadmap with costs, owners and milestones
  • Board briefings and an investment case the CFO can measure
  • Operating model: who owns AI, who approves it, who pays for it

Where I've done it

I built the technology story and ran the technical due diligence behind India's first gaming-company IPO, under the scrutiny of public-market investors.

How do you measure the return on AI?
By outcome per dollar, not model accuracy. Each use case is tied to cost removed, revenue enabled or risk reduced, and tracked as cost per successful outcome, alongside latency, error and escalation rates.
Do you replace our CTO or CIO?
No. I work alongside them, often as a sparring partner for the CEO and board. Where there's a gap, I can step in as a fractional Chief AI Officer while you hire.
Discuss this with me →
Architecture

Agentic AI Architecture

"Our agents work in demos and fail in production."

Agent pilots rarely fail because the model is weak. They fail because nobody can govern them, afford them at volume, or explain them to an auditor. I design the layer that fixes that: one governed gateway for every model call, an orchestrator that decomposes work by its shape, and agents that ask for a capability rather than a named model.

“The demo is the easy part. Production is where AI earns its keep.”

What you get

  • Reference architecture for your stack, cloud and regulators
  • Governed gateway: policy, PII redaction, model routing, caching, audit
  • Orchestration and agent registry design, including when not to use agents
  • Evaluation harness that gates every release
  • A build plan your team can own

Where I've done it

WAI-SDK, my agentic operating system: 257 agents across 23 model providers and 530+ tools, at 99.99% uptime.

When is agentic AI the wrong choice?
More often than people admit. If a task is one well-scoped call, a good prompt with good retrieval beats a swarm of agents on cost, speed and reliability. Agents earn their place when work needs decomposition, tools or re-planning.
Which models do you use?
Whichever clears the quality bar for the task at the lowest cost and latency: large, small, domain or reasoning models, from 23 providers including Amazon Bedrock. The architecture keeps them swappable.
Discuss this with me →
Governance

AI Governance, Risk & Compliance

"Regulators and customers ask questions we can't answer."

I build governance into the platform so it doesn't slow anything down: policy checks that run alongside generation, personal data tokenised before any external call, human review only where the stakes justify it, and an audit trail that writes itself.

“Governance is a feature, not a gate.”

What you get

  • Readiness for the EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, SOC 2, India's DPDP Act 2023 and GDPR
  • Risk classification of every AI use case
  • Human-in-the-loop design that reviewers can actually keep up with
  • Tamper-evident audit trails and evidence packs
  • Sector overlays for banking, healthcare, legal and public sector

Where I've done it

Governance built into the kernel of both of my AI platforms, including jurisdiction-isolated data and mandatory human review for high-stakes answers.

What does the EU AI Act mean for us in practice?
Classify each AI use by risk. High-risk uses need documented data governance, transparency, human oversight and logging. If the platform already has audit trails and human review built in, compliance becomes reporting rather than a rebuild.
Can governance be added after launch?
It can, but it costs more and slows everything down. Built in, it's what lets a regulated business ship at all.
Discuss this with me →
Cost & performance

AI Cost & Performance Engineering

"Our AI bill grows faster than our usage, and it's slow."

I audit where the money and the milliseconds go, then apply the same four measures that cut run-cost 65–75% on my own platform: a model cascade that tries the small model first, semantic and prefix caching, routing to the cheapest model that clears the quality bar, and tiered memory so agents stop re-reading everything.

“An agent that is 5% smarter and 10x more expensive is a bad trade.”

What you get

  • Cost and latency audit per workflow, with a baseline
  • Model cascade with a reliable escalation signal
  • Caching and provider strategy
  • Evaluations so savings never cost quality
  • FinOps dashboards and budget guardrails

Where I've done it

65–75% lower AI run-cost on WAI-SDK, sustained at 99.99% uptime; 50–60% LLM cost reduction at QX Lab AI.

How fast can we see savings?
Usually within the first workflow, because the audit finds waste before any rebuild: repeated context, oversized models on simple tasks, missing caches.
Won't cheaper models hurt quality?
Not if escalation is driven by evaluations. The small model handles what it handles well, and anything that fails a confidence or validation check moves up.
Discuss this with me →
Modernisation

Legacy-to-AI Modernisation & Scale

"Our core systems are old, and AI can't reach them."

Most companies don't start from a blank page. I connect what you already run (ERP, core banking, telecom stacks, decades of data) to AI through governed APIs and agents, and modernise first the parts that block value. Where scale is the problem, I redesign for the next tenfold jump.

“Legacy isn't the enemy. It's the foundation you haven't connected yet.”

What you get

  • Estate map: what to wrap, what to modernise, what to leave alone
  • Governed API and agent layer over legacy systems
  • Event-driven redesign and cloud migration plan
  • Reliability plan: availability targets, failure modes, observability
  • Change plan for the teams who run it

Where I've done it

Platforms scaled to 100M+ users and ~6 billion events a day across 11 companies; a decade of telecom and VAS platform engineering before that.

Do we need to replace our legacy systems first?
Rarely. Wrapping them with governed interfaces usually delivers value in weeks, and it tells you which parts are actually worth replacing.
How do you keep 99.99% uptime during change?
By designing for failure: stateless services, backpressure, circuit breakers, gradual rollouts and observability everywhere. Reliability comes from architecture, not heroics.
Discuss this with me →
Future computing

Quantum & Future-Computing Readiness

"Quantum will break today's encryption, and we don't know where we're exposed."

The urgent step is cryptography, because data stolen today can be decrypted later. I inventory where long-lived data is encrypted, plan the move to post-quantum algorithms, and keep the architecture swappable so hybrid quantum-classical workloads can be adopted when they pay. For health and life sciences, I also prepare data and governance for bio-computing.

“Quantum won't wait for your roadmap. Your encryption shouldn't either.”

What you get

  • Cryptography inventory and post-quantum migration plan (ML-KEM, ML-DSA)
  • Quantum use-case screen: optimisation, simulation, search
  • Hybrid quantum-classical pilot design where it earns its place
  • Data readiness for biological and multi-omics computing
  • A plain-language briefing for the board

Where I've done it

Post-quantum cryptography in a sovereign platform design; QuantumForge, a quantum-classical lab in build; multi-omics precision health at Dirghayu.

Is quantum computing useful for business today?
For most workloads, not yet at scale. The value today is readiness: quantum-safe encryption and an architecture that can adopt quantum methods when they beat classical ones.
What is post-quantum cryptography?
Encryption and signature algorithms designed to resist attacks from future quantum computers, such as ML-KEM and ML-DSA, now standardised by NIST.
Discuss this with me →
Product

Product & Venture Building

"We need a CTO who can take this from zero to one."

As a fractional CTO or CPO, I take a product from idea to a platform that scales when it succeeds: product strategy, architecture, the first team, the MVP, and the investor story. I've founded or co-founded four ventures, so I know which corners are safe to cut and which aren't.

“I've been the founder across the table. I know which corners are safe to cut.”

What you get

  • Product strategy and positioning
  • Architecture that fits the budget now and the scale later
  • MVP delivery and the first engineering hires
  • Technology narrative for investors
  • Build partnership through WizardsTech Global when a team is needed

Where I've done it

Four ventures across governed AI, legal AI, preventive health and precision health; AAYU recognised by India's Ministry of Ayush.

Do you work with early-stage startups?
Yes, selectively, usually as a fractional CTO for 3–12 months while the founding team hires.
Can you help us raise?
I help with the technology story, the architecture diligence investors will run, and the numbers behind them.
Discuss this with me →
Diligence

Technology Due Diligence

"Is this company's technology worth what we're paying?"

For investors, acquirers and companies preparing to list, I assess architecture, scalability, security, AI and data risk, team and cost, then say plainly what's strong, what's fragile and what it will take to fix.

“Buy the commodity. Build the differentiator.”

What you get

  • Diligence report with a clear view on value and risk
  • Risk register with severity and cost to fix
  • AI claims checked against what actually runs
  • 100-day plan for the new owner

Where I've done it

IPO technology diligence and M&A integration at Nazara Technologies.

How long does diligence take?
One to three weeks, depending on the size of the estate and access to the team.
Can you verify AI claims in a pitch?
Yes. I compare what the deck says with what the system does: model use, data rights, evaluations, cost per outcome and governance.
Discuss this with me →
Sovereign AI

Sovereign & Regulated AI

"Our data can't leave the country, and we can't afford to be wrong."

I design AI that keeps data inside its jurisdiction, runs on small owned models where it can, and checks every answer before it's used: the source must exist and say what's claimed, and the answer must stay faithful to it.

“Sovereignty is an architecture decision, not a hosting choice.”

What you get

  • Data residency by architecture, per jurisdiction
  • Small owned models with escalation to larger ones
  • Citation-grade answers with a two-axis check
  • Post-quantum cryptography and zero-trust security
  • Human review where the stakes are high

Where I've done it

A sovereign legal-AI platform across India, the US, the EU, the UK, the GCC and Singapore: 164 specialist agents per jurisdiction, live in India.

What is sovereign AI?
AI whose data, models and processing stay under a country's or institution's control, usually inside a defined jurisdiction, with its own security and audit.
Which regions do you cover?
India, the GCC (UAE and Saudi Arabia), Singapore, the UK, the EU and the US.
Discuss this with me →
Engagement models

Six ways to work together

Fees depend on scope, so they aren't listed here. A short brief gets you a clear proposal within a few days.

ModelTypical lengthBest for
Strategy sprint2–4 weeksAn AI roadmap the board can approve
Architecture review2–3 weeksA second opinion before a big build or migration
Technology due diligence1–3 weeksInvestors, acquirers and companies preparing to list
Advisory retainer6–12 monthsCEOs and boards who want a standing technology adviser
Fractional CTO / Chief AI Officer3–12 months · 2–3 days a weekScale-ups and mid-size firms between hires
Build partnershipProject-basedWhen a delivery team is needed, through WizardsTech Global